The New Right also believe that they only encourage diversity in family types and therefore are bad for society. State policies and laws can be seen as assisting the family in things such as childcare therefore they are a good impact on family life. An example of this is the ‘working family tax credit’, which was developed to remove child poverty and focus benefits on children in need. Functionalists see this policy as a benefit to society, as it encourages families to form and helps parents with socialising and raising the next generation (financially). However, Marxists would disagree and say that this policy as it supports the working class mostly therefore encourages people to work at the benefit of capitalism.
Government assistance designed to help the working or out of work American has become a form of income to some families. This misuse of these programs is infuriating. As fellow Americans and tax payers this is terrifying. The thought of someone who cannot afford children they already have becoming pregnant and having more children they cannot afford is unbearable. Some of these programs are SNAP(food stamps), government provided health care, utility assistance, and even checks from the government to help pay for your children.
Private funding is a good option, because talent of children will be encouraged, but poor children are often excluded for this way of funding, because their parents cannot afford private schools. Supported education by government is a good thing, because everyone can go there and poor children who are hungry to learn will get a chance to be successful, but the culture of making learning something to love is absent. Therefore, private funding is the best way of education. In this essay I will give you arguments why private funding is the best way of education. Firstly, at private funding schools the size of classes are smaller, by which there comes more individual attention for children.
A married couple could divide those responsibilities and schedule their work hours so that the kids hardly spend time alone. It will be easier to guide them in a positive direction. Poverty is a major factor that negatively affects the households. Both the parents and the kids will have a much more stressful life and that stress will reflect upon their performance at work and at school. An education costs money and a single parent with only one source of income plus all the other payments will definitely cause problems.
So the welfare state is very beneficial for people like this, as it gives them money which can cover the cost of childcare, and help in the mean time to pay the bills and increase the income for the family to live on. The welfare state targets the ‘poor’ as they the believe they need help to survive healthily, this has some disadvantages though, as the people who are earning just over the amount necessary to be entitled to the welfare state will not receive as much money in benefits, so it would almost benefit some people to earn less to put themselves under the cut off line, as they will be worse off than the people entitled to the welfare state. The
The higher wages paid by the employer have to be made up somewhere. In a free market, if an employer is producing a commodity, he will inevitably try to use the fewest possible dollars to make the highest quality products. This means that he will hire the best workers he can, for the lowest wages he can. This enables him to hire more workers, thus creating jobs and decreasing unemployment. It also ensures that he can put a high quality product on the market at a relatively low price.
Many have argued that schools should provide an environment free from ads and corporate influence. But others argue that corporate sponsorships are a necessity for “cash strapped schools.” Budget cuts are attacking schools all over the nation, so it's nice to see that corporations are helping to keep sports programs running. it can also be a way of showing community togetherness, like if it's a local business or corporation throwing support. Public schools need to be run by a business and obtaining corporate sponsors would be a great way to bring money into the schools. The problem is that the funding is low due to all the spending the government does and in the end limits money for education.
Marxists would agree with this as they believe that due to the capitalist society we live in the rich get richer and the poor get poorer so therefore the poor woulg live in poverty during their lives. They also believe that this is true due to the difficulty of breaking out of poverty itself as even if the child is exremely clever the home values may to be just accept the situation and 'live for the moment' and due to primary socialisation they will do this and many believe the only way for them to not continue to experience poverty throughout their lives would be to educate and train children to compensate for their home values. New right also agree with this to an extent they believe that the 'underserving poor' which does involve children as they have no say into what type of family they are born into, remain in poverty for the duration of their lives as they learn through the culture of poverty to live for the moment and through socialisation depend on state provision and creates 'welfare dependancy' which they will carry on during the course of their lives. However, other sociologists do not agree with this as functionalists would argue we live in a meritocratic society in which it does not matter if you are poor or working class if you put in the effort you will be rewarded. For
Allowing them obtain better paying job opportunities. Create more jobs with better benefits for low income families as well as a way to get a better education. As stated by Arloc (2005), in figure 1 below, exams done to the Census shows that the U.S public benefits system helps to reduce the poverty in nearly half of Americans. Some of these children may not develop well-mannered vocabulary due to the majority of their parents having difficulty speaking proper English. In a poor socioeconomic group, students are more likely to drop out of school; this happens since the environment around them does not allow them to achieve an academic goal or have parents who support them.
Due to budget cuts to public schools, those extracurricular programs in those schools are the ones taking the biggest hit out of each of the programs. There are many parents who believe that taking their children out of public schools and putting them into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), pathway schools because it is more beneficial to their students overall learning. The argument is that in order to perform better on standardized testing in schools the arts are not as important and should not take president over core classes and they