Source 2 offers very little evidence to say that the disaster wasn’t Captain Nolan’s fault other than blaming Lucan for acting according to the captain’s enthusiasm. Whereas source 1 does offer a fairly good reason as to why the sole blame can’t be put upon the late captain’s shoulders, it states that the charge was so opposed to Nolan’s own theories on tactics that he would have never suggested it, even under excess of enthusiasm. Source 3 on the other hand shares the blame around no one man is solely responsible for the failings that day. This is the only source that does put some blame onto Nolan. There is a varying
If so, explain. Yes, WIRETIME, Inc. has committed a tort called tortious interference with a contract. They caused a contracting party to commit a breach of contract. They induced Janet to not fulfill her contract by interfering for their own benefit. Janet can prove that the third-party interferer acted intentionally, by their actions and the contractual breach (which they were aware of).
Prosecution Argument: Brinegar already had a reputation on transporting illegal alcohol, and when was pulled over he admitted to having some alcohol on him. Defense Argument: That the police had no probable cause on seizing the alcohol, or a warrant. Decision/ Rationale: While the police don’t always have to be correct in conducting a warrantless search, but the search must always be reasonable. Dissent: 6-3: Mr.Jackson dissented that, “the 4th amendment and are not mere second-class rights but belong in the catalog of indispensable
There are also others who do not drink often that do not tolerate alcohol well. Those who do not tolerate alcohol well are obviously impaired. People who tolerate alcohol well may have an above average BAC, but not be impaired since they are more experienced. People who have such a great toleration for alcohol should not be lumped in with the others who do not and cause accidents. If they are punished, then it should not be in the same way as the people with no tolerance are punished since those people caused more of a risk to others than they did.
The outcome of being unaware of your actions and actions of others to no memory of what happen when during your intoxication of being powerless leads to “RAPE”. Guys are not always to blame for rape just because they are manly does not mean they force you. It could have been the female victim that led the case to unsafe
In order for a defendant to be liable, the plaintiff must establish both negligence and proximate cause. (Aaron Larson, Law Offices of Aaron Larson, October, 2003). Esposito was injured due to Davis knocking into her when he turned around. The negligent conduct was Davis turning around without warning. The owner of the craft show could be liable for the accident of his employee under Vicarious Liability.
The company had accomplished multiple unfair practices, from interrogating employees to not recognizing their bargaining rights. After reading the case study I couldn't help but side with the union. The way Larry Melton went about finding information from his employees was interrogating and disrespectful. They had valid persuasive arguments against the company including to threaten an employee for refusing to reveal the identities of employees who attended a union meeting. There is no reason Melton should be personally calling multiple employees on finding out who was involved.
If an employer fails to meet its duty to conduct an adequate background check and hires an unfit employee who uses his or her position to inflict harm on others, that employer may be liable for negligent hiring. Here in this case, the delivery company hired these deliverers, one of whom had pled guilty to a charge of fourth degree burglary with an intention to commit theft from a dwelling. This is clearly a case of negligent hiring without a background check. Also liability for negligent hiring is limited to situations in which an unfit employee harmed others while on the employer’s premises or while using the employer’s property. In this case, delivering a new washing machine to the home of a customer indicates that the theft was conducted in the working hours and on the employer’s premises.
They don’t pick it up, and they don’t seem to care. Thinking about others not doing their part and adding more to their (and your) trash is disheartening, and this leads to the complaining addiction. The most common (and conditioned) reaction when things don’t work out according to our expectations is to complain. It feels easier to complain about a situation than trying to change it. We might think that it’s impossible to change the entire world—and it is—so we passively sit and continue to complain.
Termination • Some people have been terminated for whistleblowing even though it is illegal. If you are terminated, you have to prove a whistleblowing violation. For example, an employee needs to prove that he engaged in a protected activity such as asking for overtime pay, reporting sexual harassment or applying for medical leave, and that the employer took action to prevent it. If you are fired for whistleblowing, it is within your right to file a lawsuit against the employer. Mistrust • One of the effects whistleblowing can have on a company or organization is a lack of trust in the internal system.