TELEVISION SCRIPT Program: “Lights, Camera, Action” Topic: The movie Philadelphia and how it draws upon archetypal characters and patterns Interviewer: Sonya Parer Guest: Nina Clarke Broadcast Date: Tuesday, 6th November 2012 (TITLE SCREEN “LIGHTS, CAMERA, ACTION) Interviewer: Welcome back to Lights, Camera, Action. Today we have movie enthusiast and literature student Nina Clarke here to discuss archetypal narratives in films. So Nina, I have a basic understanding of the term “archetype” but are you able to explain it in a little more depth in relation to film? Nina: Basically, archetypal narratives are those universal tales, which transcend through time, to the extent that we can almost place every single movie in a category with other movies of a similar storyline. Carl Jung developed the concept of the archetype to explain the commonality of dream images and symbols recognized by people regardless of place or time.
When first read, each symbol may seem unimportant but as I further read into the text each symbol became the entirety of the novel. 3. To introduce “Dear God” I will start by explaining the significance of God and the narrator’s relationship. Also by using textual evidence to show how the novel is mostly monologue and how that supports symbolism. To introduce “The Pants” you would need to explain why the pants are important to her and how they change the dynamics of the story.
Reference to P2: REBELLION 4. Reference to P3: HUMANITY 5. Reference statement: linking the last sentence (HUMANITY) with the topic of paragraph 1 (SOCIETY) Paragraph 1: MAIN POINT 1 – “Certain to fail” SOCIETY 6. TOPIC SENTENCE: A summary sentence about what you will write in the Paragraph PARAGRAPH BODY: Explain the argument or main point – prove the above points/expand your discussion by going through the 3 points of plot/author’s world/you link in your world 7. A sentence discussing the plot and textual references to character construction 8.
What’s analyzed? And how do we analyze with and without literary terms? 8) Overall, what do you want to make sure to take away from this model? 9) What questions do you have? Second, given your understanding of style commentary and relying heavily on the mentor text analysis, write a style commentary on EACH of the below extracts (THREE TOTAL).
Note first that the question asks for “three appeals to ethos”; that necessitates at least three in your response, and while there are appeals other than those created by personae, the question guides you to consider Prose as adopting “different roles.” For each role, you must do more than summarize. Use specifics and direct your analysis to moments in the text as well as the text’s overall arc. You might start with the idea that Prose is careful to begin her essay by speaking on the friendly common ground of parenthood. As she continues, her role as educator and English professor becomes a stronger persona; the way she presents research she has done establishes this ethos (para. 29 is a striking example).
To complete the following assignment, go to this week's Assignment link in the left navigation. Character Study For this paper, select a character from a movie from the list below and write a case description of the character, including a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis. This paper should be two to three pages, not including title and reference pages, and include the following: 1. Describe background information on the character, such as demographic information, family history, social history, medical history, academic and occupational history, etc. 2.
Throughout the film version of Proof, what happens to Catherine is very similar to what happens to her in Auburn’s play. However, the movie is different from the play because it shows the characters in a different light, it takes place in many different settings, and it adds more scenes than the play does. The story lines between the play and the movie have different plots, characters, scenery, and music/sound effects. You will want to read the play to get the best scenario, and leave the movie for the ones who really do not appreciate reading. First of all, the plot of the movie was somewhat similar to the play.
In the film Margaret Mead: Coming of Age, it is mentioned that Mead’s initial research was criticized on methodological grounds. Why was that? Do you consider the criticism warranted or not warranted? What could she have done differently? e. Based on the film and the book, discuss the challenges of field work.
You must use at least three quotes in your essay (1 to prove your views. Additionally, you must use parenthetical citations in your texts that follow MLA format. Then, you should compare and contrast the morals back then to the morals of today. Primarily you will be analyzing how this play reflects universal themes and lessons applicable in all times and places. You may wish to compare Sophocles’ times with the present day, to highlight similarities or differences.
What, specifically, did you learn from this movie that was directly relevant to what we’ve been learning in our class about the course theme you chose? What does the movie add, if anything, to our discussions of your chosen course theme? How does the movie coincide with (or deviate from) what you’ve learned about criminal courts in class? • Lastly: If you were teaching Intro to Corrections, list 5 points that you would want your students to take from the movie. Your response should be stapled, typed, double-spaced, standard 12pt font (Times New Roman) in APA format (you can skip the abstract, but you need to have a cover page, running head, and sources cited in APA format), and free of grammatical and typographic errors.