1. Who will you be interviewing? Jane (name changed for anonymity purposes) a work colleague and a friend. 2. What do you know about their role or views already? Jane works in a foundation setting attached to an independent school .Jane is Key worker to 15 children and 3 of her children have ELL needs.
In other words, it is not only what is said and how it is said that matters but also what additional, veiled, or subsurface information is intended, conveyed, or perceived in reception” Lewicki, Sanders, & Barry, 2006). Negotiating for a pay increase When I was employed at Sodexho, I had to negotiate for a pay increase. My duties had increased but not my pay. Since I had never negotiated for a pay increase I need needed some help. First, I went to talk to my supervisor to see if negotiate for me but he never got around to taking care of it for me.
During my placement if a parent was to ask me something I didn’t know how to answer, or didn’t feel it was my role to respond, then I knew who to refer them to in order for the appropriate staff to be involved. In one occasion I was given some information - by a parent who was picking up their child early, who I was waiting with and there to greet the parent – about who would be collecting their child from school the next few days, which I was asked to give to the class teacher, I did this straight after so that the teacher had the important information. I think a way in which to come across professional to parents as a student, when an enquiry was made to me which I couldn’t answer, was to explain that although I wasn’t aware of that information I could refer them to which member of staff was aware straight away, this meant I was helping to the point that I could which resulted in the parents enquiry being answered by the appropriate member of staff, instead of just responding to the parent that I couldn’t answer but not helping them out by referring them to who
Assess the levels of help an individual would need to participate in a range of new activities In this case management is to help the client attain a higher level of activities if this is not met, then we need to assess why the first plan did not work and create a new plan. Use task analysis to break a range of new activities into manageable steps for an individual Evaluate different ways of positively reinforcing an individual’s participation in a range of new activities Using positive reinforcement is an
It can be implied from this that Wolsey had the ability to obtain Henry’s annulment, but failed due to his lack of effort and his half-hearted approach. Furthermore, source 1 supports this view, first implying once again that Wolsey had good contacts and that he had the ability to influence them, “Stafileo has changed his opinion”. However, a lack of effort can still be seen here as he only instructed Stafileo of the facts. It is likely that source 2 is more reliable than source 1 as it was a letter written by the Duke of Suffolk who was not directly involved in the ‘Great Matter’. As the source is also from a letter, it is unlikely the Duke of Suffolk would not have feared angering Wolsey as otherwise the letter would have been private.
I understood that although Mr. Honda’s position was to convince Scott to endorse the entire book, his primary interests were to please the Board of Education by obtaining Scott’s endorsement and to avoid insulting the original authors. Scott’s position, on the contrary, was to not endorse the book which would have disrespected the Board and the original authors. During the initial negotiation discussions, I focused on determining Scott’s interests and found that he did not want to endorse the book because he felt that he would put his reputation on the line by endorsing something that was not correct. Furthermore, he felt that he was not given credit for the work that he had performed. As I was learning about Scott’s interests, I also explained my interests to Scott.
These officers took matters to a level they never should have considered let alone followed through with. The ethical decision in this dilemma was made by a third party individual, a cadet, who reported this incident. An alternative course of action in this case would have been to follow procedure and keeping their cameras on. Had this happened then all this mess would have been avoided and an individual wouldn’t have gotten hurt. Another alternative course of action would have been for the chief and department to answering the questions from the media instead of refusing to speak to them.
Agent 50 seemed suspicious. I went on to tell him that I didn’t request back-up but requested an EVAC instead. All he could ask is, “Were they here to shut us down? Why else would they be here?” I asked him, “Why are you here?” He said, “You requested back-up.” “No, I didn’t,” I exclaimed. “I requested EVAC not back-up,” I go onto say.
REFLECTION PAPER-SIX THINKING HATS During our case study exercise I suggested using the “Brainstorming” approach but throughout the session discussions I reeled back to my traditional way of solving a problem. That traditional mindset was the right or wrong point of view or linear acceptance information. The reason I suggested the “Brainstorming” approach is from my experience working on advisory panels. Although I knew that everyone should throw out there ideas whether good or bad. What I had forgotten and did not employ is not to argue anyone’s point of view.
---What should I do---- Later on day all I could think about was how could I get that job. I probably spent the whole rest of the afternoon thinking about how I could get picked to work. At the club staff asked many of us to help out with things but we pretty much blew them off if there wasn’t some type of reward or prize. I knew that I had to somehow impress or make the staff notice me more than the others so I decided to do a few things here and there to try and stand out a little more. Also I would ask if there’s anything I could do as it got closer to the summer.