What are your personal values on this ethical issue? 3. Why is it important to consult a supervisor or colleague when you have a value conflict with a counselee? 4. How can you prepare yourself to work ethically and effectively with clients who have different values than your own?
Such issues include client’s exhibiting behaviours that are not recognised by such a society. This, in turn can lead to miscommunication and misunderstanding between the client and the counsellor. For example LaFromboise argues that “Adherence to a specific counselling theory or method may also limit the success of counselling. Many cultural groups do not share the values implied by the method and thus do not share the counsellor’s expectations for the conduct or outcome of the counselling session. To counter these differences, effective counsellors must investigate their clients’ cultural background and be open to flexible definitions of ‘appropriate’ or ‘correct’ behaviour (LaFromboise, 1985).
I have grown accustomed to be in positions of leadership and being part of decision making processes. The assessment goes on to state that Dominances accept challenges, take authority, and go headfirst into solving problems. They tend to exhibit great administrative and operational skills and work quickly and impressively by themselves. They tend to come on cool, independent and competitive with others, especially in a business environment. Dominances try to shape their environment to overcome obstacles en route to their accomplishments.
Bullshit is a double-deceit towards a person, because you are hiding the fact that you do not know the information about a topic, and you are spouting out information which you are not 100% sure of, and claiming as if you know enough to hold a conversation. Frankfurt’s statement holds water, because it is a documented argument that elegantly depicts the fight between lies or bullshit being more problematic. I agree with Frankfurt, because I myself am guilty of bullshitting my way through a few essays I have written in the past. I believe bullshit is worse than lying because you don’t think as much about the topic you are speaking about. When you lie about something, you put a lot of thought into it and decide yourself whether the truth or a lie is better for you.
Is that what you are looking for? Does this answer your
Lastly; make a conclusive comment on how much you agree with your statement by using words such as: strongly agree/disagree, mainly agree/disagree. Repeat steps for comparing sources B and C. Question 4- Will either be a utility or a reliability question! Utility- comment on how useful the information from the source is, what is useful about who, when and why the source was produced? (NOP) Reliability- How far can you trust the source by comparing the source with your knowledge, is it accurate? Anything purposely missed out?
In a metaphorical term, we gain a lens, in which allows something to be more thoroughly understood. By removing ourselves from this area of our negative, quick to judge thoughts, we can perceive something through a clearer lens which reveals details which may have been previously unseen or assumed upon. We all hope though, a person is not saying persuading arguments for his own benefit. We must use our own opinions to determine our decision. Either way could make the judger or the person giving the opinion look bad, so it is almost dangerous.
Personal observation deals with what we actually see and what you think and why you think it. It is similar to coming up with a rough draft of a paper; it is your immediate observations and feelings on the situation/problem. Personal observations, however, can not be used as a “pure and true” observation. Because it is a personal observation is can be biased and may turn out to be an untrustworthy thing to take as evidence at times. “ What we see and report are filtered through a set of values, biases, attitudes and expectations.
She argues that not only is moral isolationism the view that one ought to respect other cultures but not judge them not right but it is logically incoherent. She presents four arguments that judgment is logically antecedent to respect that outsiders can judge foreign cultures if on a provisional basis and that moral isolationism leads to a complete inability to make moral judgments of any kind, and that cultures are not as moral isolationism holds isolating barriers. Her first argument is if moral isolationism is correct then one can respect a culture without judging it. But this is logically incoherent because judgment is logically antecedent to respect. One must judge a culture to some degree in order to respect it.
Writing an Argument Writing an argument is essential to any business situation. In order to write a fairly decent argument, a person has to first find a credible source in which to base their argument off of. There are many different ways a person can communicate their argument and if they do not present their argument formally, they will cause miscommunication. Knowing which form of communication will help to present an argument effectively. By assessing information properly it can help to effectively present your argument.