| 7 | State one argument made by the author. | Rich patients in need of organs take advantage of the worlds poor. Promises of cash rewards for donation are sometimes not kept and when they are kept they can be for less than agreed upon. Given these disparities, legal organ trade will always lead to the exploitation of impoverished donors. A better solution to the global shortage of organs can be used unless the decreased had requested otherwise.
We cannot afford and will not be approved for extra advertising without research that proves that this advertising will increase revenues more than the cost. The option of raising discounts for the Skyline Buffet and gift shop is not being recommended because it increases our loss to the 20% discount. It will decrease our revenue from the gift shop and Skyline Buffet. This 5% increase has to be offset by a 5% or higher increase in spending through the current members or new members. Further research should be done to the members to see if this change would allow them to purchase more.
That’s $.15 per quart of profit that the company will be losing due to Margaret’s decision. However, had Margaret shared all of the information with the company’s controller, and they had agreed that it would mutually beneficial to continue paying her friend $.75 per quart, though the market price is $.60 per quart, then it would a the controller’s decision and it would be a completely informed decision. As a freight broker, I have had
Customers are trusting each merchant not to release their personal information to anyone, or entity that could potentially use their address or phone numbers in a harmful way. As stated by Valdez (2014), “Loyalty programs depend on the collection of customer information, which is used to personalize marketing campaigns, recommendations and discounts.” (para. 1). Therefore, customers should not be placed on a mailing list or calling list unless they approve the release of information to third parties with their signature of understanding and confirmation. Ethical Concerns Valdez (2014) advises, “Loyalty programs that reward decision makers may run into ethical issues when the decision maker is separate from the payer.” (para.
For Pharma to survive and become viable it was obvious that some decisions had to be made, but was the sale of the assets in the best interest of the corporation, or was it in the best interest of Adams and Barker? One can only conclude that the directors violated all their duties of financial interests, care and rational belief and were not acting with best information and, thus, cannot be shielded by the business judgment rule. 7. What type of lawsuit, derivative or direct, would be filed by Cornelius
My theory also is that eventually people will start bidding on artificial organs and the richer people will have say over a family that doesn't have a lot of money. If doctors wanted to replace original organs with artificial ones, it would take a lot of perfecting and obligating a clean bill of health for the patient. Who, if anyone, should be a prime candidate for these types of artificial/synthetic replacements? Do you feel that anyone should have access to them? Even a life-long smoker or alcoholic who knowingly subjected themselves to harmful substances?
When collecting data every detail is important. Practicing proper ethic techniques while collecting data may prevent future lawsuits or other potential risks. Some of the potential ethical concerns concerning the data from the Whitner Autoplex are that small amounts of test subjects do not provide the most accurate information; the data may be inaccurate do to rebates not included in the data, and customer privacy. The data set is only providing information on Whitner Autoplex, and the customers who buy products for Whitner may only like certain vehicles. The data set would gain validity if more test subjects from different Autoplex were included.
Not having the proper precautions in place could mean losing it all. It should be looked at as an insurance policy if anything goes wrong at the Café. Machines and hardware can fail. While we’ve made huge strides in the reliance of our technology, it’s still not perfect and is bound to have issues here and there. While it can be expensive for my Broadway Café to eliminate any single point of failure in my IT infrastructure, having this in play can possibly be the only way I know for sure that a hardware failure will not interrupt my service or cause data loss.
We are responsible for noticing and monitoring our own emotions. Right to make sure that opportunities for lawsuits are minimized. (Incorrect) Because the legal process can be both properly used as well as abused, operating from a place of protection is not useful. We cannot guarantee what people will or will not do. Right to expect that processes will be followed.
With the defendant they get a shot at leniency from the judge. Then there are some that say plea bargaining is unconstitutional. “Plea bargaining rests on the constitutional fiction that our government does not retaliate against individuals who wish to exercise their right to trial by jury.” (Lynch, The Case Against Plea Bargaining, 2003). essentially this means if the defendant believes in their innocence and want to go to trial the will be punished for standing up for their constitutional rights. It is my belief that plea bargaining is an utter necessity, and though it may not seem just at all times; we as a society can see how hectic the court would be if all cases were brought to trial.