Barn Burner Essay

319 Words2 Pages
Barn Burner William Faulkner's "Barn Burning" provides an excellent example of how conflicting loyalties can affect decisions. William Faulkner is regarded as one of the most talented authors of the twentieth century, writing numerous amounts of short story non-fiction and changed the way fiction was written by his revolutionary techniques. Faulkner’s short story “Barn Burning” focuses on Sarty Snopes and his father who uses fire as a method of setting disputes. Faulkner uses irony and reality to reveal the difficulty that modern man faces when “the human heart [is] in conflict with itself”. [qtd in Heller 5]. In all of Faulkner’s fiction, there is an element of spiritual annihilation. Faulkner revered modernist writer, historian and sociologist, is known for capturing the raw beauty of the rural South in all its dark complexity. While his passion of knotting together past, present and future has overwhelmed some critics, others have responded to reality of his writing. Faulkner needs a narrative technique that would seamlessly tie one scene to another. His solution was to make an object or action in one scene trigger another scene in which that same object or action was present. Barn burning, for example, juxtaposed morality and blood, which made readers choose between the two. He utilizes this literary tool in order to help the development of his characters and to express his ultimate message to the readers. Some examples of his use of irony are the unintentional yet inevitable ending of the Snopes family time after time, the similarities and differences between Sarty Snopes and his father, and finally, the two distinct purposes for which Abner Snopes uses fire. Using irony and reality, Faulkner reveals the conflict within the heart of Snarty Snopes. Like most of Faulkner’s fiction, these techniques reveal the problem the modern man. Faulkner’s revolutionary
Open Document