INTRODUCTION This case is about the unethical decisions and activities that are instructed by Phil Bailey, supervisor of Empress Luxury Line. The case also describes the ethical decision that is taken by Kevin and his refusal to follow an unethical decision of his supervisor Phil Bailey by denying making fraud with the insurance adjustor. This report will highlight the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio during following unethical orders of his superiors. Additionally, from the point of view of Antonio suitable and effective strategy will be also suggested that will be beneficial for the organization and for the employees without compromising their ethics. 1) Analyze the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio In the case, when Phil Bailey told to Kevin to charge high amount of money over the insurance company for the damage of wires and computer circuits, Kevin disagreed to do this unethical activity due to having high morality and standards.
Finally, there is a dangerous lack of oversight by FDA regulators into the safety violations of companies such as Chemins leading to a reduced rate of public health and safety. Display: There are a number of options available to the Chemins company to deal with the ethical issue of mislabeled products. One is for the company to submit to mandatory testing of their products in order to ensure that what is on the label is what the product actually contains. This testing can be performed at the expense of either the company or the government, though this author believes it is the job of a company to own the regulatory compliance expense of ensuring its products are safe for
Corporations make profit off the products they sell to the consumer.The products they sell provide the consumer with a desired form of relief he or she wants.No corportion would sell a product that would harm the consumer ,however some products sold harm the environment and in turn affect the consumer. Therefore it is up to Large corporations to minimize the amount of damage their products inflict on the environment. Corportions could produce products with materials that release less toxins and harmful agents into the environment when disposed of.If the product cannot be created from 100% bio-degradable and non-toxic materials, corporations should find alteranative measures for limiting the damages caused by the harmful byproducts of the products they sell. Example, corporations could develop stations in which consumers could bring in their used up products for safe disposal at little to no cost. Every corporation is created in order to make profit and provide a service or a product to the consumer.Most consumers do not understand the complexity of the products they buy and the possible harm they could cause.Since large corporations created such a product, they alone have the knowledge of how to safely dispose of their product.Therefore corporations should provide information on their products to aid the consumer to understand the possible dangers of the products they purchase and how to dispose of them safely.
This policy was the exact opposite of his license obligations that stated he was to report any crimes and felonies he saw. The policy forced David to into a moral dilemma where he had to choose whether to abide by Blue Mountain’s rules or to obey the police unit’s rules. As an employee David had a moral obligation to his company as well as to the other stakeholders. David`s had a responsibility to be loyal to his company as well as to keep the other stakeholders safe. In this situation the policy was unethical because it risked the safety of all other stakeholders and enabled criminal
The government may choose to keep it out of the news papers but private companies and individuals have the power to save lives. Which would be the right decision in this case but they lie and kill to protect their incomes. They are greedy and this choice and be considered wrong. Morality is low. Now Acshenbach knows and he has the power to alert others of the immediate danger.
Thesis Statement In case of companies outsourcing to nations without labor laws and union laws, it is quite possible that there is exploitation of workers and practices like child labor prevail. Under such circumstances it is considered unethical to outsource and so the US government should restrict companies from outsourcing to countries where labor laws and union laws are not stringent. Genre and 2 reasons for using it The kind of research planned to be conducted is a descriptive and exploratory research. The main reasons for this are that it is a concept where ethics are involved and hence it is subjective. Moreover there are no fixed norms in case of a theoretical research and hence literature review can be used for the purpose of exploration.
There was not a written agreement between United Thermostatic Control and the customers, so therefore, the shipments should not have been sent. Campbell had been reassured by Lorenzo, Executive Vice President of sales and marketing, that there is nothing wrong with recording the revenues in 2010, however, this was still a concern for the CPA, Tony Cupertino. The legality of the events was within the laws of federal, state and local government. Reporting the revenue properly after sending out the shipments would not have violated the FOB shipping point. Although the shipments were sent before they were scheduled to, Cupertino was uncertain whether to pursue this issue any further.
Taking responsibility has been served as a privilege. Since the IKEA was unaware of making the mistake by accepting the contract without further investigating the production facility of the supplier. By having a representative showing up on the video program, IKEA will proclaim that not only the company has guts to accept mistakes it committed but also cares to rectify it. Last but not the least, Marianne Barner should further mention IKEA‟s inadequate engagement in social
We believe that both the employee and the employer were unethical in this case because it illustrates a degree of moral intensity. The employee had a due diligence to the employer and should have brought his concerns to higher management instead of blogging it on a low profile under a false name. The employer had a due diligence to the employee and should have expressed their concern to the employee. The employer could of asked the employee if he could have deleted the blog or edit it so that the name of the employer was not mentioned. The degree of harm that could have happened to the company was not justified because when a search was made in an Internet search and the blog was not easily accessible in the public domain and this does not give the employer the just cause for termination of the employee.
These companies make a point of following the law to ensure that others cannot take legal action against them. For example, a company may create more waste than necessary, but it will remove of the waste in a legal method rather than dumping it illegally. Accommodating An accommodating stance signifies that a company believes social responsibility is important -- and perhaps as important as making a profit. These companies satisfy all legal requirements and attempt to meet ethical standards. An accommodating company does not