The French Revolution was a period radical social and political upheaval in France that had a major impact on France and throughout Europe. The Cultural causes had influenced the French Revolution because of many different types of things. One of those thing was the Enlightenment. The people who liked the Enlightenment ideas were John Locke (1632-1704), Pierre Bayle (1647-1706), Voltaire (1694-1778), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), and Isaac Newton (1643-1727). The Enlightenment was a period of time when The Enlightenment was “During the 18th-century European movement in which thinkers attempted to apply principles of reason and scientific method to all aspects of society”.
French Revolution DBQ The French revolution of 1789 was a period of significant change. The ideas of the intellectuals of the Enlightenment brought new views of government and society. Political, social, and economical changes in France contributed to this change. In France, people wanted rights of equality and freedom. Equality and freedom soon became the peoples’ main focus.
Out of several causes of the French Revolution, there are three major ones; these causes will inevitably change France’s society. The Age of Enlightenment, had brought the idea of thinking, which allowed the nation to realize what their society really consisted of, making the people's minds spark with the thoughts of living in an unfair government. The social system in France would also be a major cause, it added on to the problems already brought up and associated with the age of enlightenment, which would lead to the French Revolution. The social system would bring unfairness between classes. Financial problems in France also added on to the causes.
If by any reason, peasants were to have a revolt, Nicholas could just simply sent in a little power to sort out the situation. This is backed up by the fact that the Tsar is heavily respected in his regard as not many would try to oppose him due to his sheer power socially and economically as well as privately. Peasants were agricultural workers and the poorest element of society who didn’t actually own any land but instead, worked on land using manual labour. The Russian peasants of this time had the ideology of slavery in their minds and this would’ve been on the contrary from other peasants from around other parts of Europe. The problem of the Russian peasants of this time was that they were not politically aware, they were the dark and dull masses and they tended to be superstitious.
Some of the things they spent it on were golden statues of themselves, banquets that were very expensive and clothes made out of the finest, unique fabrics instead of trying to develop the infrastructure of Rome. By spending so much money on themselves, they had to raise the taxes so they could carry on paying for their own well-being. As they raised the taxes, less people could pay for their well-being such as food, which caused another problem, poverty. Furthermore, another problem was how much money the Roman Empire spent on creating new buildings, which were built on people’s land. But the empire were very inconsiderate and silly as people were paying the taxes by growing and harvesting crops which they would sell to the markets in order to pay for the taxes.
There is a failure to realise that long term better economic welfare also means general higher standards of living, as people have enough money to buy everything they need and some of what they want, competition is rife so drives quality up and prices down, and the government are able to take in more taxes from firms who are much healthier financially. This mass employment may lead to more jobs, but the workers themselves or the way they’re used is hugely inefficient. Another reason that labour production in the UK is so low is the lack of competition. There is a strong body of evidence that competition enhances productivity. So, with a lack of one there is a lack of the other.
I would not recommend imperialization because it is unnecessary and risky. Based on this examination, the United States should keep to ourselves and focus on bettering our country before we even consider interfering with another
In a socialist state, the government evaluates the contributions of all workers and fixes wages accordingly. This seems a fair system. Yet, the reality of the situation is that any government's ability to pay depends on the size of the gross national product. If this is inadequate, everybody's pay will be low, with the exception of the favoured few, and standards of living will also be low. It is therefore an irony that many governments are abandoning socialism in favour of the freedom of the market economy to create wealth.
However, I disagree that this English poverty is worse than the Third World poverty because the poor in England have a chance to live well, but in India the poor have no chance to live well, and there are many people in Third World countries who are also spiritually poor like England, so that means this English poverty is not the worst. First, the poverty in England is not economic, but moral and cultural because the English poor do not have good family relations and strong family ties. One of the important elements to be moral is to have good family relations. If a person has strong family ties, he or she will take care of much more things about life because this person will build his or her life on family members, their benefits and their goodness, so that will lead to a person to
Why was there revolution in Russia in 1905? One long term reason why there was revolution in Russia in 1905 was poor living and working conditions. The source would agree with this as it states one reason for the 1905 revolution was social resentment. Workers in the factories earned little (in fact, wages of urban workers were purposely kept low) and everyday items like alcohol and clothing remained costly (Matteo could have written ‘continued to rise due to inflation’) Another long-term reason was oppression from Tsar Nicholas II who was conservative. This meant that he believed he had divine right to rule Russia traditionally without liberal reforms.