Army Crew Team

975 Words4 Pages
The Army Crew Team Case Hongyu Cao A20273494 Current Situation Analysis According to this case, coach P mentors two rowing teams that are Junior Varsity and Varsity. Both of the two teams are selected through a rigorous selection procedure after checking on some various factors, including strength and conditioning, rowing technique, psychological dimensions and program organization. Unusually, Junior Varsity (JV) crew team boat frequently beat the Varsity (V) boat during the practice. Worse, there’s only one week left to culmination of season, the National Championship Race. As a result, coach P should try his best to solve the problems and lead his team to win the game as soon as possible. The major criterion for selection of the team member was the individual rowing skills, including individual strength, technique and endurance. Also, coach P took into the account the combination of players who performed better while working in a team. However, an effective team needs the combination of many factors, such as effective communication, sense of trust, good attitude, common goal, respect to others, etc. For the V boat team, we could find that no one was a leader while some of members were team disrupters. On the other hand, JV boat had no disrupters. The V boat was slowing down because of placing individual on the boat. The whole is less than the sum of parts. On the contrary, the JV boat team seemed like a whole, which made them perform better than the sum of parts. In addition, the V boat team didn’t want to change anything, as a result, they did not have the positive attitude to the CEP training, which was introduced by the coach, as the JV boat team did, who always considered the training technique as a crucial tool and they wanted to learn and improve themselves. The V members criticized each other in negative ways while the

More about Army Crew Team

Open Document