For example, greed causes businessmen to compete with other businessmen, thus, keeping prices reasonable and forces them to keep up with consumer demands. But then greed could cause businessmen to make not so smart decisions to make more money which may affect everyone in the economy negatively. But I still believe that greed is good for capitalism in the US. I
Economic Goals of Business and Government VS Social Goals of Consumers Milton Friedman suggests that the social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits (Boardman, Sandomir and Sondak 221). While increasing profits is certainly one of the most important factors in a successful business, is it considered a social responsibility, or better yet, the only social responsibility of a corporation? Friedman seems to think so. But why is increasing profits a corporation’s social responsibility? According to Friedman, “A corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business.
Executives are hired to act as fiduciary agents of their stockholders for the purpose of increasing wealth (Smith, 2003). He argued that CSR amounted to spending the stakeholder’s money that clouded decision making by reducing the firm’s focus on maximizing profits, thereby placing the firm at a competitive disadvantage (Smith, 2003). Friedman’s approach is practical and takes into account the interests of both firms and society. However, it is not realistic to think that a firm can separate business and social responsibilities. According to Mintzberg "the strategic decisions of large organizations inevitably involve social as well as economic consequences, inextricably intertwined...there is no such thing as a purely economic strategic decision."
So just as profits reward producers for making things people want to buy at prices they are willing to pay, losses punish producers for wasting resources and producing things people don’t want at a cost consumers are not willing to cover. Negative profits and business failures serve a productive function in the process of business growth and development. When one business enterprise in a market economy finds a way to lower its costs, competing enterprises have no choice but to scramble to try and do the same. Any change in the economy, such as an increase in demand for a product, requires further changes and adjustments in many aspects. Any kind of change in the output of one product will most likely require changes in other markets, as well, and will start a chain of adjustments.
These resources are then diverted into productive channels. A capital market facilitates and promotes the process of economic growth within my manufacturing business through several ways. The changes in a market will have an effect on the decisions a manager makes. Supply, demand, inventory and production can all be affected by a thriving or poor capital market. The success and effectiveness of a manager will result in investors in the manufacturing company or people who withdraw their investment.
The next issue is a role of TBTF institutions. Firstly, some businesses that are so large can make up a significant part of an economic sector. So their failure could cause the sector to crash and damage the economy. Secondly, the failure of TBTF companies has the potential to take other businesses down with them, as all companies maintain relationships with partners. When a major source of orders disappears, a
The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits while maintaining integrity and loyalty to its consumers. Since responsibility is a human characteristic then it is the duty of the managers to ensure they meet the desired outcome of the owners/executives. In most instances the desired outcome is to make as much financial profit while adhering to all business laws and ethical practices. Business ethics relates to the good or bad things that occur in business practices. Many times the bad situations that may arise do not happen on purpose and the effects that they have on the consumer may be short lived.
Within this model, the rich elite are the ones that control businesses at the expense of the average person. The Countervailing Forces model shows the BGS relationship as a complex exchange between many major elements of a society. These forces are stronger or weaker depending on many factors such as “the subject at issue, the power of competing interests, the intensity of feeling, and the influence of leaders.” (Steiner & Steiner, 2009, p. 14) This model differs from the market capitalism model because businesses can be
Many are quick to point the finger of blame at greedy corporations that are gouging, manipulating, or at the very least, taking advantage of the consumer. This case provides extensive information on the factors that affect the prices in a commodity market; principally, supply and demand. Thus, if supply is short and/or demand is high, prices will go up. Because the cost of doing business for big oil companies basically remains the same, companies like ExxonMobil make their biggest profits at a time when the consumer is being hit the hardest. The case also provides information on the effect of futures trading markets on price.
The power shifted to the new elite. The way the new elite are making more money than they deserve is that they form monopolies. “Small storekeepers and merchants are becoming the clerks and salesmen of great business houses” (page15) and the big corporation form monopolies. We call the wealthy industrialists “robber barons” because they made a lot of money through “exploitation of the working class.” For example,