Arctic Mining Case Study

2477 Words10 Pages
Introduction Leadership, motivation, communication and teamwork are very important components in any organization. Strong leadership qualities serve as a foundation and through team building and motivation; these qualities are the pathway to a successful organization. In this paper I will discuss the case of Arctic Mining Consultants, where I will address the components that are lacking and how they impact the team. Case Synopsis Tom Parker is an experienced geological field technician and a field coordinator for Arctic Mining Consultants. Tom was in charge of leading a job assignment that involved staking 15 claims near Eagle Lake, British Columbia. Tom selected John Talbot, Greg Boyce and Brian Millar as his field assistants, whom he had previously worked with. In order to complete the job within one week, each person had to stake at least 7.5 lengths each day and if the job was completed on time, there was a $300 bonus for each of the field assistants. As days passed by, Tom became agitated and furious with the field assistants because some of them were not meeting the required target of completing 7.5 lengths per day and he was worried the assignment would not be completed on time as planned. The problem became worse due to the fact how Tom managed and treated his team. Tom was constantly questioning Brian as to why his performance was so poor and even when Brian tried to explain to Tom that he was working as hard as he could, Tom did not reason with him at all and told Brian that he needed to work harder and smarter. This lead to Brian feeling as though his work was not valued as he was the only assistant Tom seemed to focus on when he was angry. At the end of the assignment, the only key motivator for Brian staying on the assignment and not quitting was the $300 bonus that they were to receive upon completion. Below is a chart that illustrates each field

More about Arctic Mining Case Study

Open Document