Apush - Agrarian Discontent

577 Words3 Pages
The reasons for agrarian discontent in the late 19th century were derived from trusts and monopolies, railroad freight costs for transportation of produce, and the circulation of money. Arguably, some of their complaints were not valid. The agricultural depression at the time in question could not solely be blamed on the government. Come to think about it, it was simple economics that mostly brought the farmers down. They grew too much too fast during a time where it wasn’t as required. The deflation was caused through that mostly, rather than the government’s actions or inactions. The Populists blamed trusts as one of other causes for the blow against them. Their thoughts and outlooks were voiced by James B. Weaver in A Call to Action: An Interpretation of the Great Uprising (F). He said that the trusts themselves were monopolies and that they controlled land production and sales through threats, intimidation, bribery, fraud, wreck, and pillage. Carnegie and Rockefeller rising up and controlling the steel and oil industries did not affect the farmers in the way they thought it did. Farmers could grow their crops without having to worry about how the steel and oil business was running. Those two monopolies alone had almost no effect, positive or negative on agriculture. The freight trains were in fact a problem for the farmers. Raising the rates threw the farmers off and with the depression of their business they didn’t have the money to spend to get their produce to markets anyhow. There was practically no competition with the railroad so prices could fluctuate almost however the man in charge wanted them to. When this happened, the little guy would reach an impasse. “That ruins me, do you understand? … You promised me a two-cent rate.” (H) This ruined the farmers because one way or another, they’d go broke. When this happened to a farmer, he had to give up his
Open Document