How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? Suggestions for Writing Annotations • Content: What is the resource about? Is it relevant to your research? • Purpose: What is it for?
4. Explain the author’s main contentions and briefly discuss them using concrete evidence from the book. This may be in short quotes or in paraphrasing points. You may use outside reviews and commentaries to reinforce your interpretation. 5.
When examining a source of information, ask your-self the following questions: - Who wrote the document, and why did he or she write it? - Was the author or organization closely involved in the event? Could that have affected what was written? - What credentials does the author have to indicate that she or he is a reliable source? - What organization published the document?
Of more interest, perhaps, is a comparison of the values associated with each text. To what extent has this point of view been your experience in your study of Emma and Clueless? 4. How has the composer of the contemporary text used the earlier text to say something new? Answer this question in relation to the TWO prescribed texts you have studied.
Analyse the ways history and memory generate compelling and unexpected insights. In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing. History and memory are both multifaceted ideas that are challenged continually. History is often perceived as fact, in the recount of an event or retelling of a story that did in fact, take place. Through study however, it becomes clear that history is a consequence of memory, which makes it unreliable and changed by circumstance.
Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Peter Novick's That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession is book of tendencies. Studying the works of many noteworthy historians is shown to expose a story about the tendencies of their thought.
You may also have to discuss which points of view are missing from the given documents. Since the DBQ focuses on historical skills within a world history framework, remember to place documents chronologically, culturally, and thematically. You're not expected to know the author or topic of all the DBQ documents, or to include information outside of the documents. Continuity and Change-Over-Time Essay The Continuity and Change-Over-Time Essay focuses on large global issues such as technology, trade, culture, migrations, or biological developments. It covers at least one of the periods in the course outline and one or more cultural areas.
Rather they are basing their facts on controversial issues. Granted this might be the reasons families have changed, but Fox and Fumia should have conducted their own research on this subject matter to make their article more reliable. Interviewing several families, does not proof why the constructions of families have differed from the traditional family. Further, none of the families interviewed by Fox and Fumia held the government liable for their new way of life. They simply choose this way of life, because it suited them the best.
Flashback is a scene that interrupts the action of a work to show a previous event. Allusion is a reference to a mythological, literary, or historical person, place, or thing: “He met his Waterloo”. Details are the facts revealed by the author or speaker that support the attitude or
Historians can really change the way historic events are viewed by their personal choice of emphasis on specific details. Looking at an event through a positive and negative perspective, historians can choose whether they focus more on the negative view, or the positive view. Basically, it is the discretion of the historian to balance the different viewpoints so the individuals taking in the information can decide for themselves which view they want to focus on the most to grasp their overall feeling of the historic event. The problem with this however, is historians generally emphasize one point of view more than another which can direct individuals’ thoughts of historic events as a results of the historians viewpoint, and not their own. Furthermore, historians take history and document it with their own values and opinions in mind.