Anti-Recycling Essay

1617 Words7 Pages
PERSUASIVE OUTLINE TOPIC: Anti-Recycling ORGANIZATIONAL PATTERN: Refutation GENERAL PURPOSE: To persuade SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To persuade the audience to be in favor of support for Anti-recycling. PRIMARY AUDIENCE OUTCOME: To have the audience see the importance of newer recycling techniques and advocate its necessity. THESIS STATEMENT: The way we recycle today is very inefficient and we need to stop it. INTRODUCTION: (Attention Getter) Is Recycling cost effective? Does recycling help the environment? These are the questions I asked myself as I started this speech. (Link to Audience) You and I have been told that recycling was good for the environment. Have we ever contradicted it? I have and the results have truly astounded me. Look back, when have they ever given statistics in a recycling commercial? All I ever saw is people having fun in a park and beautiful views. Where was the proof? (Preview) We will first state the opposition’s counter arguments, then turn our attention to the methods which we should be doing. After searching many sources like the competitive Enterprise Institute and the New York Times, I am thoroughly convinced that we have been deceived. In this speech, I’m going to tell you what they left out, the facts about our current method of recycling. I. Opposition’s Arguments: Well-run recycling programs cost less to operate than waste collection, landfilling, and incineration. Recycling benefits the air and water by creating a net reduction in ten major categories of air pollutants and eight major categories of water pollutants. Recycling helps the world because we are reusing things instead of using energy to make more things. It is also cost efficient and the landfills are dirty and stinky! A. The proposition that anti-recycling is bad for the environment is not a complete assumption. 1. Yes, anti-recycling sounds bad, but in

More about Anti-Recycling Essay

Open Document