The testing on animals need to stop. Animals get locked up in cages and don’t get let out until the testing happens. Scientists are testing products like tooth paste on the animals to make sure it is safe for the use of the humans (Boggan 1). This is why the animals shouldn’t be tested on because the animals get locked up in cages and get stuck in there until it’s time to go into the lab to get tested on. Animals can feel anything that is going on in the body.
Rhetorical Analysis of The Evil of Animal Rights “The Evil of Animal Rights” is an article that was written by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook. The article addressees the medical testing that is being done on animals. The author of the article talks about the medical advances that have been done using animals as testing. Without the animals, there wouldn't be as many new medicines and new cures that there are now. The author also talks about the protesters and the problems they have given to the companies that have any relation with animal testing.
In David Suzuki’s, “The Pain of Animals” (2002) he attempts to highlight how for many years, scientists have utilized animals to examine the effects of experimental diseases, drugs, and vaccines as a way to skirt around the ethical consequences of experimenting on humans. As a geneticist, environmentalist, and award-winning academic Suzuki’s attempt to increase public awareness for various issues is apparent within this article. Suzuki utilizes ethos, pathos, and logos throughout his article to express his discomfort on the subject of testing on these animals. Suzuki’s interest in this subject is unending, no matter how many illnesses are destroyed through extensive scientific testing and research. Furthermore, Suzuki effectively discusses the quality of life for the animals being tested, and the depressing and deprived realities that these helpless animals survive.
The states need to come up with strict laws that will cut numbers of animal abuse. The animals in the factories are getting treated terribly. “They call their revolution (animal rights), but the changes PETA has won for farmed animals, while numerous, are not victories for animal rights so much as for animal welfare: fewer animals per cage, better-regulated slaughter, less-cramped transport, and the like”(Unknown author). PETA stands up for animal welfare and want to raise awareness so they can pass new laws on how the animals are treated inside
Drug manufacturers test medications on animals after they have been injected with viruses and diseases to see if the medications work on the animals. There are many companies who use animal research to test their products; unfortunately these organizations do not look for alternatives besides animal testing. If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies. But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. It is immoral to
Computers models are not advanced enough , and testing on plants is much less applicable to humans than tests on animals such as monkeys. Until we have a better system , we must use animal testing. A further point often raised against animal testing is that it is cruel. Some of the tests certainly seem painful, but the great majority of peoplr on this planet eat meat or wear leather without any guilt. Where is their sympathy for animals?
Should animal testing be illegal? Rough Draft Sharniece Thornton Unites States Government November 17, 2011 Introduction: Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. Many people are believed to be ignorant or misunderstand the nature of the lives that animals actually live, and are unable to understand the actual laboratory procedures and techniques. Other than the philosophical questions that arise, ethical questions are the main reason why many animal right activists want it banned in every country. Activists feel that to this day, there should be no good reason why any living thing should be subjected to this cruel punishment and unwanted torture just for serving another being’s needs.
Cloning my dog can not only affect adoption rates but it can also cause the animal to suffer if it fails. The third reason of why I would not clone my dog is because it can cause the animal to suffer if it fails. Cloned animals tend to have more compromised immune function and higher rates of infection, tumor growth, and other disorders. For example, a cloned lamb was born with abnormally thick muscles around its lungs so thick that it could not breath. Even though there are a lot of negatives there are a few positives of why some people use cloning.
Animal Testing in Cosmetics Every day, animals are tortured in labs. These animals live short, miserable lives as various experiments are done on them to test the results of cosmetic products. Things like hairspray and sunscreen are tested on animals. Animals are being tortured for hairspray. It’s really very profound that humans have the nerve and indecency to exploit helpless creatures in such way.
Testing cosmetics on animals should be banned. Millions of animals are killed every year due to the tests that were done on them by cosmetic companies for their products. Instituting safety precaution for the end-users has been their major affair to conduct such tests on animals. In contrary, more reliable results has emerged tremendously via alternative test methods that are available which does not require animal testing for cosmetics that was found by the Food and Drug Administration. More humane non-animal testing methods have been used by hundreds of companies such as “Clarins, Dermalogica, Estee Lauder and Clinique”.