Analysis Case 1-13 the Matching Principle

502 Words3 Pages
Analysis Case 1-13 – The matching principle Requirement 1 At its base the phrase “matched with revenues” as it applies to the matching principle would be considered a cause and effect relationship. When revenues are realized as a result of the application of the realization principle, the matching principle is simultaneously invoked. “In a given period, revenue is recognized according to the realization principle, and the matching principle then requires that all expenses incurred in generating that revenue also be recognized” (Spiceland, Sepe, & Nelson, 2013. p. 28). The requirement that all expenses incurred in generating the revenue also be recognized completes the calculation of net income. The matching of expenses to revenues varies depending on the specific approach to the matching principle being applied. The approach used can have significant implications to net income in the short term. Requirement 2 1. The exact cause and effect relationship is predicated on the ability to specifically identify the cost of a recognized revenue event. A good example of this would be cost of goods sold which would be considered a direct cost. As such it is easily applied to an exact revenue event. 2. Associating an expense with the revenues recognized in a specific time period is pretty much self-explanatory. This involves the application of indirect costs as they relate to a period of revenues. The idea being that the cost is related to all revenues occurring during the measured period of time, yet not able to be directly applied to a specific event of revenue. 3. The important wording to recognize in understanding a systematic and rational allocation to specific time periods is “assets that provide benefits to the company for more than one reporting period, so we recognize expenses over those time periods” (Spiceland, Sepe, & Nelson, 2013.

More about Analysis Case 1-13 the Matching Principle

Open Document