Body paragraphs may lack development or internal coherence. They are clearly related to each other but may not build off of each other in any meaningful way. 9 | Argument proceeds along a path of development that is mostly clear and logical with serviceable transitions and minimal digressions. Introductory and concluding paragraphs are on-task but might do more to frame the discussion. Body paragraphs are internally coherent but might be developed more fully or build off of each other in more meaningful ways.
| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.
You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics. On the other hand, it is better than individual differences as people may have the same thought patterns and processes. You can only obtain this information by self reports, which would probably give both of those issues; social desirability and demand characteristics. These would affect your results and therefore they would not be reliable or valid. If you were using the cognitive approach you would only get qualitative data which could be a problem as not everyone interprets the same answer in the same way.
unit 3 champion equality, diversity and inclusion. 1.1 Diversity means difference. It recognises that although people have things in common they are also different. Meaning just because two people have the same disability doesn’t mean they should be treated the same as each other. Diversity is about recognising differences and valuing the differences.
The reward/need satisfaction theory of relationship proposed by Byrne & Clore (1970) asserts that if a relationship is seen to offer the prospect of reward (for either party), it is more likely to form – if there is little or no perceived reward, the relationship does not form. Their model is based on the behaviourist principles of operant and classical conditioning. According to the former, behaviour that results in a beneficial outcome makes repetition of this behaviour more likely, whereas if the outcome is undesirable, the behaviour is less likely to be repeated or continued. A relationship that brings perceived advantages is a case of positive reinforcement but the relationship can also be characterised by negative reinforcement if the
Evaluating Alternatives 4. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider an option because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent.
With good communication it is less likely to be any mistakes made, if a mistake was made it should be able to be identified and discussed through good communication. 2.2 Promoting effective communication, the factors to consider are the individuals, and there preferred method of communicating. Verbal communication you would need the correct tone, pitch, does the individual need to be spoken to loudly slowly and clearly, or they could prefer quite softly and perhaps on their own. Correct eye contact is a factor to consider when communicating with anyone, staff or individuals. 3.1 People from different backgrounds, for example a some culture’s would find eye contact rude and unacceptable, some people from different backgrounds may use slang words for example, calling people babes, me duck, or may ask if they want the loo, some people may not understand what that means which could cause distress and a misunderstanding.
Any time an arguer intentionally leaves a premise or conclusion unstated, it is safe to assume that the omission was intended to conceal a weak or questionable step in the argument. Answer: false Reason: just sometime the missing statement is something so obvious and familiar that it would be tedious to state it explicitly. 4. When an argument is standardized, the conclusion is placed above the premises. Answer: false Reason: When an argument is standardized, the conclusion is placed under the premises.
It varies because of mood and behavioral influences. If one is in a bad mood they will typically communicate negatively and without thinking about the affects it may have on someone else. Regardless of how we communicate we need to realize that all communication is cultural. In essence, it portrays ways we have learned to speak and send nonverbal messages. Not only are there different principles and contexts to consider, but there are also cultural barriers.
John Swales, the author of “The Concept of Discourse Community” tells the difference between “discourse community” and “speech community”. And I will tell you my thoughts about it. I think, the most different point is that discourse community has a wider edge of people while speech community may have more specific situation of people. A group consisted with people speaking specific language or dialect could be called a speech community. Yet discourse community consisted by people who have the same goal, using language or some other tools to intercommunicate with each others; different language would not be a problem.