Contrast the nature and spatial distribution of world cities with mega cities in the developing world? World cities= Tokyo, New York, London and Paris Mega Cities= Mexico City, Lagos, Beijing, Bangkok The nature, character and spatial distribution of world and megacities is dictated by the function they perform in the globalised economy, where they fall in the hierarchy of dominance and dependence, and their importance nationally and locally as a result of their role within their own nations. Nature The nature or world cities are largely defined by the process of globalisation. Since the 1950s the economics of the world richest economies have been increasingly integrated into the global economy, to such an extent now that they perform the role of command and control centres. This has occurred as a result of rapid advances in transport and telecommunications technology, such that it is now possible to buy and sell stock, place orders for delivery/production of good and discuss business strategy at the click of a button.
Exam Question 1 Deprivation is the damaging lack of material benefits considered to be basic necessities in a society. A key statistic that stands out in the data is that Liverpool has 50% of very high levels of household deprivation. This shows that the biggest need for regeneration is in Liverpool by far. The deprivation in Liverpool could be due to the industrial decline suffered in Merseyside during the 1980’s. When a city suffers an industrial decline, there is often a rise in unemployment, and there will also be a lot of derelict and unused land left behind.
The growing economy makes the cost of living more expensive, the overpriced houses are closer together, so you have very little yard to keep up with. The larger city also has faster internet and cable television. There are many disadvantages to living in the big city neighborhood. The economy has inflated property values and taxes, adding the cost of living. The crime rate is very high, putting you and your family at greater risk of being the victim of a crime or violence.
Combine inexpensive labor with modern factory technology, and one may understand the reason for huge investments in city expansion projects and infrastructure, and perhaps the Chinese competitive advantage. But even though China can now be seen as part of the modern world, it is still important to remember its history of human suffering, alienation, and
In order for corporations to make money, they produced things related to the rising popular culture. [3] The rise of this new culture was due to an increase of cities, rise of a consumer society, and the change in morals and behavior. [4] During the twenties, more than half of the population lived in cities. New social classifications were created: laborers and managers, blue collar and white. [5] There was also a rise of leisure time, emergence of an urban middle class, technological advances, and an increase of wages.
P1 * People in lower socioeconomic groups have less opportunities People in lower socio-economic groups do not have as much education as the upper class. It is also unlikely they will have private healthcare and lower socioeconomic groups are not likely to have as good quality food as the people higher up. This is because healthy food with better quality tends to be more expensive. Lower socioeconomic groups are also less likely to have as much leisure activities. This is because they have not got much money and leisure activities cost a lot.
Housing prices in the privileged inner city are rising much faster than those of outer urban areas,potentially impeding inboard migration. (Holcombe, n.d,2014)Due to this, the market of house property situation will be tense, which reveals from that poor people are unable to afford the price of housing and they are forcing to live the fringe of the city where is not developed well. And the gaps between poor and rich areas will be emphasized by urban consolidation form by dividing them into different areas. Furthermore,people found that more emotional stress and psychological conditions are generated in high density areas. (Neuman,2005)The environmental aspects of urban consolidation is quite different with in developing the form of urban sprawl.
If one is faced with an option of moving to either city, it can prove to be a hard decision to make. Houston and San Diego have similar communities. Both have large communities, with a large population. Cities with a large population tend to be overcrowded, have a higher rate of automobile traffic, high crime rate and a competitive real estate market. For example, Houston has lower living expenses than San Diego but San Diego’s pay grade is higher.
Whereas in the south; large percentages of the population cannot afford to buy goods which are not absolutely necessary, as they live in poverty. There are also less transnational corporations in the south, although there are still some especially in the big cities
Which in fact it is, since is the fourth largest city in the United States. Houston is a unique city; a multicultural city that has diversity in every corner you take. The high population that live in Houston see it as a home not because it’s highly populated but because all its population make it what it is right now. Furthermore, because Houston is a metropolis, there are stereotypes that come with it. Some of these stereotypes consist of: high amounts of traffic, raised gas prices, and elevated housing costs.