A Reader's Analysis of Moll Flanders

1482 Words6 Pages
A Reader’s Analysis of The Fortunes and Misfortunes of Moll Flanders It’s interesting to have read Moll Flanders after pretty much everything else: in particular, to have read it right after Tess of the D’Urbervilles and What Maisie Knew and, especially, to read it concurrent with Chekhov, because it seems so much less complex by comparison, both structurally and thematically. The number of observations made about the individual human condition or society at large are fewer and generally less weighty or ambitious--which is consistent with the characteristics of the narrator--and though the stakes can get quite high the tension is mediated by a pervasive sense of benevolence. (In the preface to the version I read it was observed that there are no wicked persons in the book.) It seems clear that Dafoe does intend to comment with some seriousness on the precarious situation for women in his day, and at the same time to raise questions about what I would imagine were more commonplace ideas about sin and wrongdoing at the time, but this is tempered by a persistently benevolent tone, and it also seems clear that a large part of the story’s intent is simply to entertain. Actually, I’m left with the sense that Dafoe meant this story to serve that latter function to a greater degree than other authors we read. Part of what makes the story so benevolent is the fact that often when characters do something to escalate the tension, they do so with good reasons that are usually made explicit with a prolonged explanation. The gentleman who took Moll as a mistress, for example, only breaks the affair after illness has forced him to re-examine his conscience, and having made the decision he exerts a lot of effort to explain himself to Moll (and she understands). Also, the women who fetch the constable that will take ultimately Moll to Newgate are furious, but the master of the
Open Document