Free Essays on Drugs Debate

Anti Essays :: Free Essay on "Drugs Debate"

You can search for more free term papers from Anti Essays using the search box above.

Sponsored Essays by TermPapersLab.com

  1. Debate On Drugs
    Debate On Drugs The debate over drugs continues to disturb the American public. Many Americans take at face value the assumptions that drugs cause addiction, which leads to crime,
  2. Drug Debate
    Drug Debate Drugs Debate "Junk yields a basic formula of "evil" virus: *The Algebra of Need*. The face of "evil" is always the face of total need. A dope fiend is a man in total
  3. Drugs
    Drugs The Debate Over Legalization of Marijuana Pro marijuana legalization groups such as the Physician's Association for AIDS Care, National Lymphoma Foundation argue that

Plagiarism Warning

This free essay is for research purposes ONLY. Do NOT submit term papers from Anti Essays as your own. If you use information from this free term paper, it is your responsibility to cite it. MLA and APA citations can be found at the bottom of the page.

Drugs Debate

Submitted by antiessays on January 24, 2008



"Junk yields a basic formula of "evil" virus: *The Algebra of Need*. The face of "evil" is always the face of total need. A dope fiend is a man in total need of dope. Beyond a certain frequency need knows absolutely no limit or control. In the words of total need: "*Wouldn't you*?" Yes you would. You would lie, cheat, inform on your friends, steal, do *anything* to satisfy total need. Because you would be in a state of total sickness, total possession, and not in a position to act in any other way. Dope fiends are sick people who cannot act other than they do. A rabid dog cannot choose but bite."

There is a large variety of recreational drugs available today and it is evident that they do not all have only detrimental effects. There are essentially two categories of drugs: mind expanding drugs and mind constricting drugs. It might also be useful to consider a category of drugs which are neither mind expanding or mind constricting, though, it would be difficult to find any recreational drugs which would fit in this category. The division of categories should be based on how the drug affects intellectual stimulation. The drugs in the mind expanding category should broaden the scope of perception and knowledge for the user. The drug should educate the user and "expand" the user's mind. The drugs in the mind constricting category should deter the user from learning, and even if one did claim to gain some sort of knowledge from the high, the knowledge, in the end, would amount to meaningless, confused thought. The rare drugs which stimulate violence, such as angel dust, must definitely be considered mind-constricting because not only does the user not gain knowledge from the experience, but the user destroys self-control and liberty and triggers desires to act immorally. This division of drugs into categories does seem to be of the nature of platonic perfectionism but the ideology is not entirely based on this ethical theory and some...

You must Login to view the entire essay.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!

Citations

MLA Citation

"Drugs Debate". Anti Essays. 21 Nov. 2009
<http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/994.html>

APA Citation

Drugs Debate. Anti Essays. Retrieved November 21, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/994.html