This pathos describes how Lincoln would care for his people and how he would put the task of helping the people suffering from the war first, serving as a strong pathos since it is not only emotionally affecting his people, but also encouraging and giving them hope. The war destroyed millions of families. Lincoln in the first place gave his attention on healing the people and their families, instead of describing how beautiful the future would be and giving unrealistic assumptions This pathos and ethos made people, no matter the North or the South, to feel that they are in unity. Both sides were suffering the same war and urged to end it, while they shared a same religion. God plays an important role to connect the people together, which enhances Lincoln’s credibility in his speech besides his position as a president and occasion of this speech.
Due to the semantic field of fear and terror running throughout the discourses of Bush and Blair their choice of lexis is crucial in conveying their political ideologies. The introduction of Bush’s speech was of dire importance. Antithesis is being used within the first sentence; Bush begins his discourse “… Our fellow citizens, our way of life…”, and then ends with “deadly terrorist acts”. Due to the contrasting image portrayed listeners feel their “way of life”, they, as individuals and citizens of America are at threat, of “deadly and deliberate terrorist attacks”. This further promotes the global normalisation of terrorism and the “War on terror”.
The way JFK structures his speech was in an order that made out the problems first and then saying the solution afterward to give that insurance that it could be done. As evidence, Kennedy uses very common fears among the people, something everyone can relate to, and they can have confidence in removing. Within his speech, John uses many forms of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. One example of the usage of Ethos that he uses was when he naming how God is important to him and the United States’ future. “If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich,” stated Kennedy.
Being a war-opponent and social activist, Howard Zinn’s most likely intention in writing “Unsung Heroes” was to educate people about the mistakes (and deliberate lies) that are, in his opinion, very common in the perception of American history. Also, he likely wanted to direct attention towards the un-credited but “true” heroes who may not be shining enough to fit the common definition of a hero, but who have made meaningful contributions and therefore deserve to be remembered. In any case, they are people who are not responsible for killings of native Americans or the suppressing of minorities. Despite the popularity of Zinn’s views and of “A Peoples History of the United States”, there is an opinion that Zinn is overly pessimistic in his interpretation of the past. Further, some people complain, as he states himself, that they feel “thoroughly alienated and depressed” after reading the book.
This affected the results of the experiment because it shows that we go along with group or an authority figure when we are being pressured instead of standing up for what we as individuals think is right from our individual point of view. An example that would support my evaluation based upon group pressure and conformity would be when US soldiers took Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in 2003. These soldiers took these prisoners and abused and humiliated them. These soldiers abused and humiliated these prisoners because they we told by a higher command to do so. These soldiers feared if they didn’t do what they were told they would face consequences.
He also stated that all the stated in his speech challenges can be eradicated if everyone would work together. That is why he stated “We the people in order to for a more perfect union”. Senator Obama started to give a brief history to relate to his audience the rationale behind his thesis. This paved the way for the speech, because he highlighted a lot of grievances in his introduction that brought him to his thesis. The appeal to his logos is that he had been-----.
Justin Wood M. Rouse English III/Period 2 23 October 2012 Rhetoric in John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Speech John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech was initially addressed to the public during a time of fear and insecurity about Russia and the Cold War. The people needed reassurance from their newly elected president, and Kennedy needed to make a highly persuasive speech. During his speech, Kennedy used rhetorical devices such as alliteration, metaphor, and allusion. The main purpose of the speech is to tell the American people that they elected the right man for the job, and the use of rhetoric reinforces the major points. Anaphora is a very common device used in speeches.
In his article, Haidt proposes that this celebration was an example of man’s needs for survival, which is human’s most primal instinct. This instinct, according to Haidt appeared shortly after the September 11th terrorist attack, as people formed long lines to help those in need and show solidarity to those affected. It was the same solidarity and group effort that allowed America to prevail as a nation and endure the hardships of the war on terrorism. Therefore, this celebration symbolizes the gathering of a nation coming together to commemorate the capture of those responsible for the September 11th terrorist attack, despite the nation’s cultural and religious boundaries. The news of Osama bin Laden’s death also revived the emotional state Americans found themselves in after the terrorist attack; which increased a sense of patriotism by priding in the work of the American government
Thucydides’ work, however, was not simply a book written about Athens as the protagonist which was defeated by its foolish over-ambition, he wrote about the Athenians and Spartans with similar objectivity, acknowledging both their weaknesses and virtues. Thucydides regularly demonstrated a “determination to establish what happened and why”. He believed one of the primary reasons for the decline of Athens was because of the political problems with democracy and selfish imperialism. Whilst he used facts to support this belief, he expressed it most directly when quoting speeches. I will examine the purpose of Thucydides’ work by assessing his omissions, the events he chooses to focus on more closely, and his own analysis of his work.
Aleeza Waxman Mrs. Beach AP English September 29th, 2013 President Kennedy’s inaugural speech introduced Americans to his ideas and beliefs that he wanted to make a reality during his presidency. He tries to convey a sense of trustworthiness because if the nation doesn’t trust him, they will never feel comfortable during his term in office. Kennedy uses strategies like pathos, antithesis, and parallelism to help interpret his goals to the people and form a good relationship with the nation based on trust. Throughout the course of his speech, President Kennedy uses several persuasive appeals to inspire and gain the trust of his audience. However, Kennedy effectively uses emotional language to make his audience feel involved in his goals as President.