Anti Essays :: Free "Abolishing Insanity Defense" Essay
Below is a free essay on "Abolishing Insanity Defense" from Anti Essays, your source for online free essays, free research papers, and free term papers. Anti Essays also has a database of thousands of other free essays, free research papers, and free college essays. You can search for more free essays from Anti Essays using the search box above.
This free essay is for research purposes ONLY. Do NOT submit essays from Anti Essays as your own. If you use information from this free essay, it is your responsibility to cite it. MLA and APA citations can be found at the bottom of the page.
Submitted by fsaari on May 6, 2008
Insanity in criminal law is the condition of a mental disorder or mental defect that relieves a person of criminal responsibility for his actions in an accused crime. At the time of the act, the person help responsible is said to be not in the right mental state of mind. With this, the person was either not knowing that he was committing a crime or had no control over what he was doing. Though, the insanity defense is not always accepted or even allowed in some states, people have still gotten away with crimes throughout history. Abolishing the insanity plea would stop such things from happening. (Washington Post, John P. Martin, February 27, 1998)
The insanity defense has been abused more than being used correctly for years. If the defendant is found mentally ill, the defendant undergoes treatment at a mental institution before the sentence is carried out. (New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, pg 329) One of the most known cases of someone pleading not guilty by reason of insanity would be the John Hinckley trial for shooting President Ronald Reagan. John Hinckley got away with his crime without a scratch. He was declared not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a mental institution. However, Hinckley isn’t the first person to be set free. The insanity defense dates back to the 1843 assassination attempt on British Prime Minister Robert Peel. In this case, a psychotic named Daniel M’Naghten intentionally killed an assistant to a prime minister of England because he believed he was being persecuted. The defendant pleaded insanity at the trial. Physician’s conclusions were based on hearing the testimony and observing the defendant’s behavior. After the judge looked over the physician’s opinion, the prosecution agreed to stop the case and the defendant was declared insane. The Queen and House of Lords strongly disapproved of the verdict, so they called on fifteen judges of the common law courts to answer a series of questions about the law of...
You must Login to view the entire essay.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!
"Abolishing Insanity Defense". Anti Essays. 20 Jul. 2008
<http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/8637.html>
Abolishing Insanity Defense. Anti Essays. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/8637.html