He began shifting the Department’s strategy from a reactive, efforts-based approach to a proactive, results-based approach. He focused on preventing crime before it began by sending more officers out on patrol rather than having officers sit in offices waiting to respond to 911 calls. He followed the “broken windows” theory and his police force went after “quality of life” misdemeanors with the belief that enforcing such misdemeanors would lead to a reduction in more serious crimes as well. In addition to pushing officers to be more proactive in the fight against crime, he introduced new performance measures that monitored managers’ plans for action and such action’s results. Prior to these measures, and in other police organizations across the country, work had been gauged in terms of effort (e.g., how many 911 calls were answered).
A number of researchers have argued that many crime problems can be addressed more efficiently if police officers focus their attention on these deviant places. The appeal of focusing limited resources on a small number of high-activity crime places is straightforward. If crime can be prevented at these problem places, then police will be well positioned to lower citywide crime rates. In Policing Problem Places, Anthony Braga and David Weisburd make the case that hot spots policing is an effective approach to crime prevention that should be engaged by police departments in the United States and other countries. There is a strong and growing body of rigorous scientific evidence that the police can control crime hot spots without simply displacing crime problems to other places.
Conditions of an officer’s reaction to certain responds would change (Grant & Terry, 2008). With only reactive patrols we would not have officers trying to stop crimes before they happened. Likewise, with only proactive patrols we would have all of our officers positioned in targeted hot spots or crime problem areas and would not have the quick response like what reactive patrols can serve (Grant & Terry, 2008). In order for our policing agencies to succeed in every possible way, both preventative measures for reducing crime and having the ability to send quick response units, they have to incorporate both reactive and proactive patrols. Both types of patrols serve a unique purpose and can be reduced
The three core elements are the mission, strategy, and organizational structure of police. The mission was crime prevention. The idea behind crime prevention was that it is better to stop the crime from happening than respond to the crime after it occurred. This strategy was accomplished by having uniformed officers patrol “beats” and interact with the community. This would allow for a police presence and deter criminal activity.
Police officers differ from civilians and neighborhood watch members in many ways, though notably in the areas of equipment carried and training. This additional equipment and training give police officers more authority and responsibilities than civilians. Since the police handle community safety as a part of their jobs, civilians should defer to them in all areas of community policing. Civilians and members of the neighborhood watch or volunteer policing agencies may not have the equipment or training that police officers have, but they can still assist law enforcement officials in many ways. The most powerful thing an individual can do to help prevent crime is to be aware of their surroundings and to know what to do in certain situations.
Using community members and community programs will help the police in times that something is going on, but it is not necessarily an emergency. The era of homeland security may look like there is no room for this form of policing, but that is not true. There are many ways in which community-oriented policing can work in conjunction with the various areas of homeland security. Just because the police may be working toward a goal in homeland security does not mean that the community has to be completely left out. There are many ways in which the community will play a very important
1. I do believe CRASH is an important unit that needed to be created in order to understand how gangs worked from the inside. 2. There should not be a different recruiting or supervision of a unit like this because working a dangerous job like this calls for people that have been involved with crime in their past and already have an understanding of what it is like. These certain people also call for a great amount of street smarts to go along with their professionalism.
Predictive Policing Predictive Policing is one of a range of tools using better data, more finely crunched, to predict crime. They seem to promise better law-enforcement. Crime is one of the hardest aspects to have a first responder appear unless they are in the right place at the right time. Police departments around the world are taking on a new strategy to help them enforce the law, reach respondents and ultimately lessen the crime wave in known areas. Even though some fear that this type of system may ultimately bring on automation to police forces and lose the human interaction, others feel it is great effort to protect communities.
When we look at the advantages from qualitative method we know that it is unqualified data that is accessible to individuals with a discrete point of view of the hypothesis which in this case would be the police officers. Qualitative research depends on methods and these methods are going to have to relate how the information is received. Some ways that may be partaker observation, non-partaker observation, planned and semi-planned interviews, ground work reports and examining that data gathered. In my hypothesis I would be using a survey given to police officers with questions for them to answer to help find out if they feel they get satisfaction from their career as a police officer. When you look at all this data we can not only establish a hypothesis its results are nothing but evident.
Prevailing Theories of Crime Control The prevailing theories of crime control are allowing police officers to have more authority and seek more help for the victim among the societies. The crime model itself states that if the police make an arrest and a prosecutor files criminal charges, then the accused individual should be presumed guilty because the fact-finding of police and prosecutors is highly reliable. With that being said crime is always going to be around. The crime model seeks more detention centers for suspects. The crime control model reflects conservative values to ensure that communities are safe and receive all the help necessary.