How convincing is the argument that the year 1822 marked a turning point in the way Lord Liverpool’s government approached its domestic policy ?

On the face of it , the year 1822 did mark a significant turning point in the way Lord Liverpool’s administration dealt with its domestic policy . The importance of the cabinet reshuffle after the imminent death of Lord Castlereagh in 1822 , and the perceived move toward‘ Liberal Toryism’ following this date has been well documented by a number of early historians , including W.R Brock and Spencer Walpole. ‘ With the changes of 1821-3 Liverpool was able to gather round him a group of liberal minded men ready to take whatever opportunities were offered for economic reforms ‘ The years of unrest , spanning from the end of the Napoleonic wars in 1815 to the cabinet reshuffle of 1822 would also seem to point to a much more tolerable and less repressive government after this date .The Six Acts of 1819 were a repressive low for   Liverpool’s administration. What followed throughout the 1820’s was a series   liberal minded reforms led by   Robinson , Huskinson and Peel ,   which did seem to change the nature of government .These men have generally been accredited with setting Britain on the road to free trade and Peel as home secretary successfully rationalised the legal system and legalised trade unions .However more recent Historians such as Eric Evans   ,Cookson and   Gash have persuasively argued that the ‘Liberal Tory’ phase of the Lord Liverpool administration   was a natural response to the improved economic circumstance brought about by a more prosperous and confident Britain .Reforms introduced during this period were not new ideas instigated by a more liberal minded party , but those which many Tories had supported   since the Pitt administration of the 1780’s .An economic revival simply meant that these ideas could be...