The conflict of euthanasia has been viewed differently within the United States, enabling its present legal status and limitations. It has become a concern as to why a country as grand as the United States had limitations on certain medical procedures. There are two main focus points on the topic of euthanasia: legalities within the country and the aspects of religious morals. The social policy issues on legalizing euthanasia had led to just one state legally practicing the procedure. The American Medical Association has given much authority to euthanasia and how this medical procedure can be attributed to terminally ill patients. Legislations within the states of Oregon, Texas, and California have also altered bills that can legally make euthanasia an official exception, varying on circumstantial situations. It turned out that Oregon became the only state that copiously recognized euthanasia for the benefit of the patient and made the procedure legal. Religion is not to be misconstrued with the legalities of euthanasia, but it must be understood that the reason as to why majority of the United States do not agree to allow euthanasia to be legal may be for the fact that certain religions have created a high impact on the opinions of many within the remaining forty-nine states. The concept of this analytical literary composition is to discuss the conflict of the legalities and morals of euthanasia within the United States, and unravel the affect it has on today’s society.
What is Euthanasia?
There are several definitions that specifically pertain to this same topic of euthanasia. The general meaning of euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or lapse of another individual for his or her own benefit. Since there are different ways of committing euthanasia, it is very much mistaken as an act of murder and yet is quite similar to assisted suicide. The numerous types of euthanasia are as followed: active euthanasia, passive euthanasia, voluntary...