I love the in-depth examples that he gives in this article because he doesn’t just say that women are worse putters than men, but instead he backs it up with facts that makes his claim truthful. In the article, he shows putting stats provided by the PGA and LPGA Tours that help the reader better understand what is going on. The only thing that kind of bugged me about the piece was that he doesn’t display a whole lot of emotion which doesn’t help his cause. But if you ask me, I would say that his lack of emotion doesn’t hurt his cause because he does such a great job with the examples he gives. After reading this article, I started to pay closer attention to this poor-putting issue and I noticed that everything he points out is entirely true!
It seems very reliable because it was found on an online web center that only publishes from credible sources. This research is objective as it doesn’t offer its opinion, but rather sticks to the facts of how Dahl began to write. Thanks to the article being published scholarly, it offers a lot more credibility. This source helps as it gives me information on the beginnings of Dahl’s writing career. "Dahl, Roald."
I think he is an excellent public speaker and his insight is invaluable. The twenty seven years he has served in the Police Force is admirable. I have met many Police Officers before and even though they were very nice and seemed to be good people, I liked how honest and straight forward Commander Levy was. He admits his faults and is honestly trying to make a difference in our world in an area that is difficult to address and talk about. Without him and countless others striving for the same goal, we will never see change in our world.
First, I’m going to review about United State’s cultures in the 1960s. This decade was the age for youth as 70 million children from the post-war baby boom became teenagers and young adults (American Cultural). Some books were introduced at this time such as “To Kill a Mockingbird”. This book was written to review the social distinctions between races. Art also takes a big role around the 60s.
From beginning to end it gave me a lot of information on the subject. This book definitely gave me more answers than questions. This book was surprisingly easy to read and its period language really did not become an obstacle for me to be able to fully understand the book. Although some of it's hardest words were from documents that were written by people who fought in the war. Like old english words and writing.
This just show no matter how nice, smart, or kind you are, you will always be racially profiled. Yes, other examples would be convincing but they would not be necessary in his essay. Staples did a good job of making his point about how he felt being profiled in his examples. He even mentions another story, Norman Podhoretz, the writer of, “My Negro Problem—And Ours,” as an example. All the examples he gave about his life made it easy to feel like we in his shoes.
It is not the actual states that put the “United” in the United States; it is the people of America that put the “United” in the United States. Through a well-organized essay, “One Nation, Slightly Divisible,” David Brooks describes the diverse ways of life between Republicans and Democrats. Brooks effectively uses strong nonbiased points to assist the reader in agreeing and understanding his every thought. This allows Brooks to easily reach his intended audience- anyone interested in the diverse ways of life between Republicans and Democrats. America is a united nation despite the differences between people and their culture.
The debate was very interesting. I thought that both sides had their pros and cons, but in the end, I thought that Joe Biden had the better argument, for multiple reasons. His speaking was very effective and, in my opinion, had a very influential argument. When he gave his points, he always seemed to have statistics to back up his argument. This made him more reliable as a candidate, because he has hard evidence, as opposed to Sarah Palin, who didn’t have many statistics at all.
“Examine what is said, not who speaks,” suggests an Arabian proverb. While this may be good advice, Mark Twin proved in his novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, that communicating effectively may very well depend on who is speaking. His use of the character Huck Finn to convey his various views on society is much more effective than if he would have used another avenue, because the story is told from Huck’s first person point of view, Huck is an extremely relatable character, and Huck’s experiences bring him through struggles that deal directly with Twain’s opinions about the pre-Civil War social structure. Because Huck’s story is told in his own words from his own point of view, Twain is able to communicate his opinions very adequately. Twain quickly establishes the character and personality of Huck with sentences such as, “Then she told me all about the bad place, and I said I wished I was there.” (Twain 2) By using Huck’s brash, but also childlike, voice as his mouthpiece, Twain is free to expose the reader to his own views and opinions.
Many believe that because of our nations progress regarding racial issues, that racism is no longer a problem or even roadblock in people’s lives. This seems to be pure ignorance and even racism on most people’s part, whether it be intentional or not. Now while the advancements in our society have been great, racism is still very much alive today, and I think WEB DuBois would share a similar opinion. Concerning pay inequity, not only gender but race is a huge factor in the wage gap. A black man and a white man can have the same job and the white man can still be paid more.