Piaget On Moral Development

806 Words4 Pages
Piaget`s theory of moral development Piaget`s theory on moral development focused on the moral judgment and reasoning that children make, he was interested in the way children think, he wanted get into their underlying cognitive thought processes, over many years he carried out a number of studies on children’s verbal attitudes to, lying, stealing, clumsiness and game rules. He believed that in contrast to the social learning theory, and by studying their cognitive processing he could support his theory that children, learn at different stages and are more than capable of making their own decisions in relation to moral development, rather than just copying role models as the SLT claims. Piaget experimented looking at moral judgments in a game of marbles, his studies support his view that there were two distinct stages, children aged 5-9/10 have a heteronymous perspective on rules, they see the rules as something that is just there, set in stone, coming from another plane and have a strict obedience to them, even if they don’t understand why. Piaget`s theory claims that at this stage egocentrism is a major factor, the children are unable to see the world form anything other than their own point of view, suggesting that this limits what they are capable of understanding, however, children aged 10+ had a autonomous view on the game, they were able to see the benefits of having rules, and had a mutual respect for the game, they recognised that the rules could be bent for the good of the game, debating the rules to some length, (more time debating than playing the game itself) and overcoming their egocentrism, it would suggest that their moral reasoning has developed; Piaget clearly suggests that the importance of disagreements and resolutions was a significant part of the study, he also believed that social environment also has a influence, playing with peers
Open Document