In the first source, a quote from Edmund Burke, he is articulating his ideology on how government officials should represent constituents in a democracy. Edmund Burke was the founder of classical conservatism, which fundamental values are based on an elitist hierarchy, limited freedom, and equality before the law (Rule of Law). He is expressing one of the elemental points of classical conservatism, the unhindered action of the upper class. The reasoning for the government being constructed this way is due to the idea that lower classes were lacking in material and monetary wealth, as well as education. In classical conservatism, the upper class, or elitists, were in power, not the entire society.
The world is your destiny. The community wanted a more fair and equal government. However, the king was not expressing equal freedom fairly. Unfortunately, the king wanted to make all the rules while the whole community had to abide by and follow them without conflict. However, the citizens wanted to make their own rules to follow, sensible and understandable rules.
In his book he specifies that ‘’if every does what he or she does best, the society as a whole would become more productive’’. Engels, on the contrary, wrote the book “The Communist Manifesto”, believed strongly in communism. A weak link in communism is that consumers are unable to obtain what they desire since the government decides what each individual acquires. And so, communism is always bound to fail because it stands for equal sharing of resources, in this case grinding individual rights to powder and then using it to build its idol of absolute sovereignty. Communism signifies a classless society that doesn’t see a difference between the rich and the poor.
Liberalism suggests that government should intervene to “help” but never to “curb freedom.” Liberalism also says that ordinary men and women are entitled to satisfactory lives, but that individual liberties, including the right to prosper from ones efforts, should not be curtailed. The same ambivalence is apparent in the liberal approach to the question of interdependence, both among individuals and among nations. People and polities are interdependent and must show a humane concern for one another, but at the same time the individual person or state has the right to pursue individual interests. The liberals believe that all human beings are capable of reason and rational action, but that they are often caught in difficult situations in real life. I believe that people are born equally and we are all brothers and sisters but when it comes to liberals they believe that people are not born equally but that everyone has an equal opportunity to develop their skills and abilities, whatever they may be.
Although democratic practices were on the way in the capitalist countries, he asserted that democratic politics possessed no advancement. Their destinations are totally different. Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience was the first great declaration of the right and duty to commit civil disobedience, which intended to set the demands of conscience above the demands of the law and the ruling authorities, to keep human’s moral obligation which was to resist evil, to make the democracy and justice come true. Nietzsche, on the other side, aimed to rebuild the deposed hierarchy system of the society, to realize elite politics that only a small group of people manage the society. From this perspective, their reasons for nonviolence are also divergent for their
This believed that humans would progress without any regulations. The near opposite was Communism. Communism believed that the government should have full control in order to separate the dynamic of rich vs. poor. The perfect balance of these was Welfare Liberalism. This philosophy has the perfect balance between regulations and a free enterprise.
Locke believed the power of the government came from the people and if the people are not happy with government actions then they have every right to overthrow the government. Locke believed people could survive in a natural state with no government but if the people like the government it can exist to benefit them. . (Locke, Chap. 4 Pg.
He wanted to establish a “dictatorship of the proletariat,” which means that the working class majority would rise to power over capitalist minority. Marx believed that this could be achieved by a revolution, and then a generous, benevolent dictatorship of the working class. Greatly differing from consecration, Marx’s ideas were solely from the word of man, such as ideas from Plato, earlier utopian societies of Robert Owen, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and smaller utopian experiments in the
Capitalism Capitalism is an economic and political system where economy production is controlled by private owners and consumers instead of the government. The theory of capitalism was created by Adam Smith, author of “The Wealth of Nations” to achieve economic freedom. He reinforced the term “Laissez- Faire” meaning the government should not interfere with the economy because the “Invisible Hand” or supply and demand will naturally set the prices and quantity. Consumers’ actions influence business owners’ decisions on what to produce, how to produce and for whom to produce. Capitalism is most often seen in a market economy.
It is important in a democracy that every person have equal protection of the law because a democracy is composed by the citizens of that government, if not all people are included - regardless of age, race, sex, ethnicity, or nationality, then it is not a true democracy. A selective democracy does not and cannot exist. Every citizen should be subjected to the same laws and rights and any other citizen. A democracy flourishes when all citizens are involved and all citizens enjoy all the rights as any other citizen. Punishing a person harsher or inhumanly simply because he or she is of a different race for instance in unconstitutional.